首页> 外文OA文献 >Systematic review of systematic reviews for the management of urinary incontinence and promotion of continence using conservative behavioural approaches in older people in care homes
【2h】

Systematic review of systematic reviews for the management of urinary incontinence and promotion of continence using conservative behavioural approaches in older people in care homes

机译:对护理院老年人使用保守行为方法进行尿失禁管理和控制节制的系统评价的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aim To synthesize evidence from systematic reviews on the management of urinary incontinence and promotion of continence using conservative/behavioural approaches in older people in care homes to inform clinical practice, guidelines and research. Background Incontinence is highly prevalent in older people in care home populations. Design Systematic review of systematic reviews with narrative synthesis. Data sources Electronic searches of published systematic reviews in English using MEDLINE and CINAHL with no date restrictions up to September 2013. Searches supplemented by hand searching and electronic searching of Cochrane Library and PROSPERO. Review methods PRISMA statement was followed, as were established methods for systematic review of systematic reviews. Results Five systematic reviews of high quality were included, three specific to intervention studies and two reviewed descriptive studies. Urinary incontinence was the primary outcome in three reviews with factors associated with the management of urinary incontinence the primary outcome for the other reviews. Conclusion Toileting programmes, in particular prompted voiding, with use of incontinence pads are the main conservative behavioural approach for the management of incontinence and promotion of continence in this population with evidence of effectiveness in the short term. Evidence from associated factors; exercise, mobility, comorbidities, hydration, skin care, staff perspectives, policies and older people's experiences and preference are limited. The majority of evidence of effectiveness are from studies from one country which may or may not be transferable to other care home populations. Future international studies are warranted of complex combined interventions using mixed methods to provide evidence of effectiveness, context of implementation and economic evaluation.
机译:目的通过对老年人护理院中的尿失禁和尿失禁的管理进行系统回顾的综合证据,从而为临床实践,指南和研究提供参考。背景技术失禁在养老院人群中的老年人中非常普遍。设计带有叙述性综合的系统评价的系统评价。数据源截至2013年9月,使用MEDLINE和CINAHL对以英文进行的已发表系统评价的电子搜索,没有日期限制。搜索包括人工搜索和电子搜索Cochrane图书馆和PROSPERO。遵循了PRISMA声明的审查方法,也建立了系统评价的系统评价方法。结果纳入了5篇高质量的系统评价,其中3篇针对干预研究,另外2篇是描述性研究。尿失禁是三项评价的主要结局,而与尿失禁管理相关的因素则是其他评价的主要结局。结论使用失禁垫进行冲厕程序,尤其是提示排尿,是该人群控制失禁和促进失禁的主要保守行为方法,并在短期内有效。相关因素的证据;锻炼,行动不便,合并症,补水,皮肤护理,工作人员的观点,政策以及老年人的经验和偏好受到限制。有效性的大多数证据来自一个国家的研究,该研究可能会或可能不会转移到其他护理之家。未来的国际研究需要采用混合方法进行复杂的联合干预,以提供有效性,实施背景和经济评估的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号